I'm going to assume you don't live under a rock and have therefore already seenJoe Jonas's fantastic new Guess spread, showcasing a rock hard body that visibly refutes what remaining Disney aura he may have clung to. It's gone - Joe Jonas is now officially a sex symbol.
But wait - then again, so isNick Jonas. He's done his fair share of Grown Up TV, plenty of sex scenes, and has his very own underwear gig with Calvin Klein,who will never let him forget it. We can agree: They are both ver. ver. sexy men.
Buzzfeed, however, recently did a post about why Joe is hotter than Nick and I imagine will write one about why Nick is hotter than Joe before the first quarter has ended (Side note: Whatever happened to Kevin Jonas?), but I am going to put a stop to this argument altogether.
See, I have an abundance mindset. Why do we have to rank them? Does one really have to be hotter than the other? Can't they both be beautiful in their own unique ways? Creating only one way to be hot and then ranking people within that narrow framework is the reason people have fucked up self-esteems. It's also not nearly as fun from an observational standpoint. (Just saying.)
Let's review their specific hotness niches and all the ways there's plenty of room for both of them in our spank banks, shall we?
Joe: Creative, Edgy
He likes to vary his hair cuts and color, takesriskwith his clothing. He fronts DNCE, a quirky yet still mainstream pop band that makes songs I can never stop listening to, damn it.
Nick: Pensive, classic
Not many men can rock a turtleneck, I'm just saying.
Joe: Likes to take his clothes off in elevators
Nick: Likes to take his clothes off in frozen ponds
Joe: Generally goes for the straight persona
Nick: Experiments with gay and bi roles
Joe and Nick: Perfectly muscled, slightly sinewy bodies, similar boyish grins.
Do you see what I mean? Joe likes to go for dark and mysterious, Nick has a boyish charm. Both great. Both different. Equally hot. Can I go home now?
